evcars4u.com

2026 Bentley Bentayga Speed: A Luxurious Beast Built for the Rough Stuff

The 2026 Bentley Bentayga Speed is the pinnacle of power, prestige, and off-road prowess, combining unparalleled luxury with rugged capability. As the world’s most refined ultra-luxury SUV continues to evolve, Bentley has taken the bold step of enhancing its off-road credentials without compromising the performance and opulence for which the Bentayga is renowned. With updates in design, technology, and capability, the 2026 Bentayga Speed redefines what it means to go off the beaten path in ultimate comfort.

A Statement in Power and Design

Under the hood, the 2026 Bentayga Speed retains the powerful 6.0-liter twin-turbocharged W12 engine that delivers a staggering 626 horsepower and 664 lb-ft of torque. This allows the Bentayga Speed to rocket from 0 to 60 mph in just 3.8 seconds, with a top speed of 190 mph. These numbers are almost unheard of in the SUV segment and place the Bentayga in a league of its own when it comes to combining sports car-like performance with SUV functionality.

Despite its luxury badge, the new Bentayga Speed features enhanced all-terrain abilities, thanks to an upgraded suspension system, revised drive modes, and improved ground clearance. Bentley’s Dynamic Ride system uses 48-volt active anti-roll technology to keep the vehicle composed even on rough terrain, offering unmatched stability and comfort on or off-road.

Visually, the 2026 model introduces subtle but effective updates. A redesigned front grille, more aerodynamic bumpers, and newly sculpted side sills give the Bentayga a sharper and more athletic appearance. New alloy wheel designs and bespoke exterior color options enhance its presence, while dark-tinted headlamps and Speed badging differentiate it from lesser trims.

Interior: An Oasis of Craftsmanship

Step inside the Bentayga Speed, and you are greeted by one of the most exquisite cabins in the automotive world. Hand-stitched leather, sustainable wood veneers, and polished metal accents define the space. Bentley offers an extensive customization palette through its Mulliner division, allowing buyers to tailor the interior to their exact tastes, from custom embroidery to exotic material choices.

The 2026 model sees a new infotainment system with a 12.3-inch high-resolution touchscreen, updated user interface, and support for both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. A high-end Naim audio system for Bentley delivers concert-hall-quality sound, while rear-seat passengers benefit from their entertainment setup, complete with touchscreens and wireless headphones.

Comfort features include heated, ventilated, and massaging seats for both front and rear occupants, a four-zone climate control system, and an advanced cabin air filtration system. The Bentayga Speed isn’t just an SUV; it’s a mobile luxury lounge capable of traversing deserts, forests, and mountains without disturbing a champagne flute.

Technology and Safety

The 2026 Bentayga Speed also packs a full suite of driver-assistance features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, night vision, and a 360-degree camera system. For off-roading, Bentley includes hill descent control, multiple terrain modes (Snow, Sand, Mud, Rock), and real-time suspension adjustments to maintain traction and stability.

A new AI-powered predictive navigation system anticipates driving conditions and suggests terrain settings, making it easier for even novice drivers to venture off-road confidently. Additionally, an optional drone deployment system can scout terrain ahead in challenging environments—a tech-first approach in the ultra-luxury segment.

Conclusion

The 2026 Bentley Bentayga Speed isn’t just a high-performance luxury SUV—it’s a testament to Bentley’s commitment to innovation, craftsmanship, and versatility. Whether cruising through the city streets of Monaco or climbing rocky trails in the Andes, the Bentayga Speed delivers an unmatched blend of sophistication and strength. It stands as the perfect example of how a vehicle can be both a beast and a beauty—unapologetically powerful, unmistakably Bentley.

Tesla Pushes FSD in Europe — Regulators Hesitate

Tesla CEO Elon Musk recently shared his frustration about delays in getting regulatory approval for Full Self-Driving (FSD) in Europe. Musk tweeted: “I am waiting for Dutch authorities and then the EU to approve. It is very frustrating and hurts the safety of people in Europe, as using advanced Autopilot leads to four times fewer injuries!”. The car manufacturer has shared time-lapse videos demonstrating FSD maneuvering through the bustling streets of Paris and Rome—encountering roundabouts, scooters, cobblestones, and more—to showcase the system’s preparedness. Based on Tesla‘s internal information, the use of FSD lowers the risk of injury by four times compared to human drivers and is ten times less prone to being involved in an accident. European regulators are approaching the situation carefully, referencing legal obligations under EU regulations such as the Vehicle General Safety Regulation and amendments to the Vienna Convention. These laws require well-defined lines of responsibility and a standard that goes beyond Level 2 automation.

Tesla’s European FSD Demonstrations

Paris, around the Arc de Triomphe: 

A notoriously confusing roundabout with 12 incoming roads. Tesla’s FSD navigated it unscathed 

Rome’s hectic, narrow, scooter‑filled streets:

Additionally, it has been effectively managed in the latest video release.

Amsterdam & the Netherlands: 

Testing in tight urban streets, including areas with cyclists, is currently in progress. It has been reported that Dutch authorities are collaborating with Tesla on a standardized FSD guideline.

Even with videos intended to highlight capabilities, European regulators continue to be unimpressed, stressing that mere demonstration does not meet legal and safety standards.

Regulatory & Legal Roadblocks: Fragmented Approval Procedures

Europe’s regulatory landscape regarding automotive technology is highly intricate and multifaceted. Tesla must navigate the approval process established by the Netherlands vehicle authority, known as RDW, which involves thorough assessments of safety and compliance. Additionally, the company is required to adhere to stringent regulations outlined by the European Union that govern the deployment of Automated Driving Systems (ADS), ensuring that these technologies meet specific safety, environmental, and operational standards before they can be used on public roads.

Legal Responsibility Concerns

Under the regulations established by the European Union, it is mandatory for a driver to maintain full control of their vehicle at all times to ensure safety on the roads. For fully autonomous driving (FSD) systems that allow for hands-free operation to be deemed legal and acceptable, comprehensive legislation must be put in place that explicitly delineates responsibility in the event of accidents—this guidance is notably absent in current laws, leaving ambiguity in terms of liability and accountability.

Ongoing Safety Scrutiny

Independently conducted tests, such as those carried out by The Dawn Project, have highlighted serious concerns regarding the performance of autonomous vehicles. These tests demonstrate a troubling failure to detect stationary school buses, which are typically equipped with flashing lights and extended stop signs, as well as the inability to recognize children present in simulations, posing significant risks to safety in real-world scenarios. Tesla’s transition from using radar technology to a camera-only system termed “Tesla Vision” has sparked considerable criticism. Various advocacy groups and regulatory bodies have underscored significant concerns regarding the system’s limitations in accurately detecting pedestrians and various objects in diverse driving conditions. This shift has raised questions about the safety implications for both drivers and pedestrians, highlighting the need for robust safety measures in autonomous vehicle technology.

Lawsuits and Legal Precedents

Germany has already witnessed significant legal challenges in various courts concerning Tesla’s promotional imagery for its Autopilot feature. Judges have emphasized the necessity for more transparent communication to ensure that consumers fully understand the capabilities and limitations of the technology being advertised.

Why Europe Is Slower Than the U.S.

Safer-but-slower framework:

EU regulations, such as the Vehicle General Safety Regulation and the 2019 UNECE guidelines, guarantee that all new automated driving technology complies with strict safety standards initially.

Legal obligations:

The changes to the Vienna Convention stipulate a “driver in control,” implying that Level 2 FSD continues to be the upper limit unless there are updates to the laws.

Liability ambiguity:

Lacking clear understanding of whether the driver or the software is to blame in accidents, regulators continue to exercise caution.

No regulatory one-stop:

Each member state can demand its consent prior to granting EU-wide authorization.

What’s at Stake? Safety vs. Innovation

Tesla claims that FSD has the potential to improve road safety, referencing a fourfold decrease in injuries when compared to human drivers. Regulators, on the other hand, assert that results from real-world testing, thoroughly validated, are required beyond what companies claim.

Competitive Landscape

The UK intends to begin trials for driverless taxis in 2026 under the Automated Vehicles Act, increasing pressure on the EU to keep pace in the realm of autonomous mobility. At the same time, competitors Waymo, Pony.ai, and Baidu are advancing in different markets.

Consumer Confidence

Public doubt persists, particularly following news reports about accidents and the ‘beta’ designation of FSD. The more stringent regulations in Europe probably mirror the desire of citizens for safer implementation standards.

What Comes Next?

Dutch-Supervised Trials:

Tesla might soon begin supervised trials of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) feature in the Netherlands due to new local regulations.

EU-Level Type Approval:

Official testing and data submissions are mandatory under the EU’s 2022 regulations for automated vehicles.

Legal Framework Updates:

The EU and national authorities need to establish accountability and obligations regarding hands-off driving.

Safety Audits & Real-World Data Sharing:

European authorities will assess the results from independent third-party tests, in addition to Tesla’s own data.

Pilot Deployment:

Despite receiving approvals, the implementation will probably be slow, potentially beginning in specific areas, perhaps in the Netherlands or Germany, prior to a wider rollout.

A Delicate Balance

Tesla is quickly working to expand the worldwide rollout of FSD and robotaxis, with trials in the U.S. set to begin soon, relying on its visual AI, urban navigation technology, and asserted safety improvements. Regulators are indicating that strong legal definitions and validated safety through peer review—rather than just impressive video presentations—are essential requirements. As Musk urged European regulators to “speed up efforts to enhance Tesla’s safety in Europe,” it’s evident that both parties sense a pressing need: Tesla for broader market access and regulators to maintain public safety. The effectiveness of Europe’s careful approach as either a protective measure or an obstacle to technological advancement hinges on how swiftly legal structures evolve—and whether Tesla’s commitments are genuinely validated through thorough real-world assessments. In the upcoming months, anticipate important developments: supervised testing in the Netherlands, results of EU safety assessments, and regulatory decisions expected in late 2025 or early 2026. This period could determine whether Tesla starts its projects or faces setbacks in its European FSD aspirations.

Tesla’s “Updated” Model S and X Highlight How Much Ground It Has Lost

On June 13, 2025, Tesla quietly introduced modest refreshes of its flagship Model S and Model X, marking the first updates since their 2021 overhaul. But rather than showcasing bold innovation, these mid-cycle tweaks underscore Tesla’s diminishing lead in the luxury EV arena.

Minor Enhancements, Major Price Hike

Tesla raised prices for both models by roughly $4,500–$5,000 across all trims—Model S AWD now starts at $84,990, while the Plaid hits $99,990; Model X begins at $89,990, with Plaid at $104,990. In return, buyers receive incremental improvements:

• Range extension: Model S Long Range now offers 410 miles (a 5‑mile gain), Plaid variant delivers up to 368 miles. Model X sees similar modest range bumps 
• Ride and cabin refinements: Enhanced noise cancellation, revamped suspension bushings, front‑facing camera, and “dynamic” ambient LED lighting updated from Model 3/Y Lineage.
  
• Subtle styling tweaks: Minor exterior changes on the S Plaid aimed at high‑speed stability and larger wheels focusing on aerodynamics 
• Utility boost: Model X gains 2.5 cubic feet in third‑row/cargo space
  

Trade‑Offs and Technical Step‑Backs

Critically, these additions come with compromises:

• Weight gain & performance drop: S Plaid is 26 lb heavier and limited to a 149 mph top speed—down from the previous 200 mph. X Plaid increases by approximately 183–186 lb
  
• Yoke steering wheel sidelined: No longer standard; now a $1,000 option only on Plaid trims
  

These regressions on speed and agility illustrate not progress, but backsliding.

Innovation on Pause

What stands out is what’s absent. Tesla’s celebrated technologies from the 2023 Cybertruck—such as steer‑by‑wire systems, 800‑volt architectures, and next‑gen batteries—are notably missing. Despite customer hopes for the transfer of these future‑ready technologies to the S and X, Tesla held firm on more superficial enhancements 

Comments in Tesla’s X announcement highlight dissatisfaction:

“People want real 3-row SUVs with more range and tech, and this isn’t that.”

This sentiment echoes a growing sense that Tesla’s flagships have become stale.

Sales: Not Just Slowing—but Sliding

In Q1 2025, Tesla delivered a mere 12,881 units across the Model S, X, and Cybertruck, within a broader delivery context of 336,000 vehicles (mostly Model 3 and Y). Further, Electrek reported a 30–37 percent year‑over‑year drop in Model S/X deliveries, attributed to weak demand, not production constraints.

These figures spotlight the decline: once-premium marquee vehicles have become niche afterthoughts.

Broad Shifts in the EV Landscape

Tesla’s minimal refresh arrives amid fierce competition. Legacy automakers and newer EV entrants (e.g., Lucid, Rivian, Genesis EV, Kia EV9) are offering premium three‑row SUVs with higher tech, better interiors, and often more range. Tesla’s continued dominance is far less assured, especially as the industry catches up.

Internal criticism adds another layer. Tesla’s past decision to bundle yoke steering into the Plaid package drew backlash; reverting it to an optional add-on reflects a reactive posture rather than confident leadership.

All Dressed Up, No Place to Go

The updated Model S and X are quieter, comfier, slightly roomier—but also heavier, costlier, and technologically stagnant. They feel like midlife facelift exercises from a struggling automaker rather than flagships of innovation.

In sum, the refreshed S and X embody Tesla’s current crossroads: once trend-setting pioneers, now symbols of a company under pressure, scrambling to keep aging icons relevant in a landscape it once dominated.

What Tesla desperately needs is substance, not just bells and whistles: a bold return to groundbreaking EV innovation. Without it, the Model S and X risk becoming elegant relics—overpriced reminders of better days.